A Regen analysis

DNO Flexibility Procurement

Tamsyn Lonsdale-Smith
Senior Energy Analyst
Regen

As the electricity system decarbonises and renewable generation capacity rises along with demand for EVs and heat pumps, the grid is increasingly under pressure. Flexibility is a vital tool to address this by supporting a more dynamic and efficient use of the network, in turn unlocking additional capacity and enabling new connections. 


At the local level, Distribution Network Operators (DNOs) have responded to this opportunity by actively procuring flexible assets on their networks. For the second year running, DNOs have been required under Standard Licence Condition 31E to publish statements detailing their flexibility procurement. 


In this blog, Tamsyn Lonsdale-Smith, Senior Energy Analyst, visualises the results of an analysis of these statements, highlighting trends across DNOs and their specific approaches to grid constraint management. Understanding the different approaches to DNO flexibility procurement and technologies being dispatched is important to ensure we continue to maximise the use of low carbon flexibility to enable decarbonisation. 

Key Findings

  • Flexibility procurement needs vary depending on the DNO. This could be due to differing strategies on flexibility versus grid reinforcement, varying levels and types of constraints felt on each network, and the types of flexible assets available to connect to the network.

  • The most commonly dispatched technologies in MWh for demand constraints are fossil fuels and biofuels, whereas generation constraints are addressed entirely through dispatch of wind and hydropower products.

  • The types of assets being dispatched and constraints being managed can vary over time, either year to year or between seasons.

The first section of this blog is an overview of the different flexibility products available under DNO procurement schemes, what they are, and how different DNOs are using each type of product.
The second section takes a deep dive into dispatch data to understand how DNOs are dispatching assets and technologies.
  • Flexibility Products

    DNOs use different products to manage flexibility needs on the network. Historically, the four main types of products used are:

    • Secure: pre-emptive management of peak demand on the network

    • Sustain: pre-emptive management of peak demand on the network where provision of services are scheduled and fixed at the point of contract at fixed delivery periods

    • Dynamic: to address planned fault conditions such as maintenance works

    • Restore: to revive the network in the case of rare conditions such as extreme weather events

    The graph below shows total tendered, contracted and dispatched capacity of projects by each product type across all DNOs, allowing the viewer to see which products are most popular for each DNO.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.

    As we see in the graph, different DNOs have experienced different flexibility needs. For instance, UK Power Networks has tendered for 753 MW of dynamic flexibility products, and ended up contracting 1.6 GW with 1 GWh dispatched during the last reporting year (2022/23). The prevalence of dynamic products in comparison to other products could suggest that deploying flexibility as part of forward planning for maintenance works makes up most of the DNOs' flexibility needs. However, in reality, this product is mainly being used to manage demand constraints on the network, despite the official definition of dynamic products. This highlights the nuance and variability of how DNOs engage with flexibility procurement mechanisms to suit their network needs.


    National Grid Energy Networks, in contrast, has tendered extensively for dynamic (480 MW) and restore (635 MW) products, but during the reporting year (2022/23) ended up dispatching more secure products (997 MWh). Around 740 MWh of dynamic assets were also dispatched, reflecting a need for flexible assets during planned outages on the network. Interestingly, 1 GWh of secure assets were dispatched, whereas only 155 MW were tendered and 50 MW contracted.


    In 2022/23, no restore products were dispatched, indicating that no unplanned outage events occurred, compared to 1,700 MWh of dispatched restore products in the 2021/22 reporting year. 


    click below to expand the next section

  • Dispatch Analysis

    The ENA highlights that 70% of contracted flexibility is made up of solar, biofuel and stored energy. However, less than 45% of electricity dispatched for demand constraints can be classified as low carbon, of which 76% were from biofuels. No solar assets have been dispatched to date.


    How much is being dispatched over time? Some DNOs have dispatched more flexible assets than others. NGED, UKPN and SSEN have been relatively active compared to SPEN and NPG, DNOs which have experienced less immediate need for flexibility. This suggests diverging strategies towards flexibility, with these DNOs possibly seeing a reduced need for flexibility due to increased investment in network reinforcement.

    In the graph below, we see that most DNOs have increased dispatch volumes as each reporting year goes on. SSEN, however, saw more dispatch occurring in 2021/22, mainly due to generation constraints. This highlights the opportunity for investment in hydrogen co-location to capture energy that otherwise is lost during periods of relatively low demand on the network.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.


    What times of the year see most dispatch occurring per product and technology? Periods of peak demand occur in the winter months, while summer months lead to periods of excess solar and decreased demand. Restore projects are dispatched most often in the spring and summer months, almost exclusively by SSEN. Dynamic dispatch is consistent across seasons, but has been growing in dispatch volume in recent months. This is matched by a near equal amount of dispatch growth from Secure and Sustain products from September 2022 onwards.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.


    What types of technologies are being dispatched per product? The types of technologies dispatched by DNO depend on the assets available in their geographical region as well as the type of constraint being addressed. By filtering the two below graphs to the same DNO side by side, we can infer the technologies being used for each product type.

    For instance, NGED relies heavily on biofuels for dynamic constraint management. SSEN on the other hand, has almost exclusively managed generation constraints by reducing wind and hydropower load on the network through products like restore to manage post-fault, generation constraints.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.


    The sunburst chart below allows us to understand the types of technologies being used for each product type.


    Fossil fuels are used for secure and dynamic products, offering quick dispatchable power. A small amount has also been used in Restore circumstances, to restore power to a network following an outage.

    Hydropower is mainly turned down as restore in post-fault generation constraint events, although a small amount was used as a secure product.

    Wind, similarly to hydropower, is used almost exclusively for post-fault generation constraints, but can also be used in sustain services. This highlights how intermittent power supply sources can be called upon to manage peak demand.

    Biofuels, mainly made up of biodiesel, have been used for sustain and secure products, and make up the largest single source of dispatched dynamic products. This is due to the availability and dispatchability of biofuels and the preference for biofuels over traditional fossil fuels.

    Demand turndown is most used for dynamic products as well as secure products. This can be a useful option to avoid increasing generation through biofuel or fossil fuel assets, during times of demand constraint.

    Stored Energy has been used in secure and dynamic products, much like demand turndown, fossil fuels and biofuels.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.
    Click for insight

    Fossil Fuels are being primarily used for Secure and Dynamic products. A higher proportion of these products could be met by sustainable sources such as stored energy, wind and demand response.

    What types of technologies are being dispatched per constraint type? Each technology is called to address certain types of constraints, which are managed by the types of products available for each constraint type. Renewable technologies, such as wind or hydro, are often used to address generation constraints, meaning they are turned down during periods of excess generation on the system. Energy storage, biofuels and fossil sources are used to address demand constraints on the system, while demand customers are sometimes turned down.

    Offline: This content can only be displayed when online.
    Click for insight

    With wind and hydropower being effectively turned down during periods of high generation constraint, there is an opportunity for hydrogen or battery co-location on site to reduce energy losses and strain on the networks.

Did you find this analysis interesting? Would you like to learn more about the intricacies of flexibility procurement and how to decarbonise flexibility services? Get in contact to discuss with tlonsdalesmith@regen.co.uk

Regen has done extensive work on DNOs and network flexibility to date. The following publications provide more in-depth analysis on the topic of network flexibility:

  • Networks Unlocked: commissioned by Scottish Power Electricity Networks to assess the current state of the networks and explores how they could be developed to deliver whole system, social and economic value.

  • A series of blogs in partnership with Piclo on local flexibility trials and the future of flexibility.

  • A 2018 blog on the early development of DNO flexibility services in the UK and results of Western Power Distribution's Expressions of Interest for flexibility procurement.

  • A feasibility study on demand aggregators, written in partnership with Carbon Coop and Community Energy Scotland.

  • A Community energy guide to local flexibility markets, outlining how community energy organisations can develop their flexibility offerings.

  • A blog on local flexibility auctions and the benefits of shifting away from fossil generation procurement.

Close