The COO mandate in 2026: running today while designing tomorrow 

Read more

What does being a ‘well-run’ organisation mean in 2026? Is it the lowest cost base, the most resilient platform, the smartest use of AI, or is it the ability to change faster than everyone else? 


As a COO in 2026, the answer is increasingly: all of the above. 

Over the past few months, we’ve spent time with COOs across professional and financial services, law firms, consultancies, market infrastructure firms and asset managers, to gather an understanding of priorities for the year ahead. While there are sector-specific nuances, the underlying themes are consistent: the COO role is no longer defined solely by internal execution. 

In an increasingly complex external environment, the COO is expected to function as a true strategic partner rather than a traditional operational manager. More than any other function, the COO is responsible for translating corporate strategy into tangible results and ensuring that vision is converted into the actual delivery of products and services. 


This shift in scope is also reflected in the expanding career trajectory of the role. According to McKinsey, 40% of COOs transitioned into CEO roles during 2024 demonstrating that the position is becoming a primary proving ground for future leadership talent. The mandate now requires a balance of immediate performance and long-term positioning, meaning that the COO role today is as much about running today’s business as it is preparing for tomorrow’s. 


Four predominant themes are appearing repeatedly in our discussions: 


  • 1. From running to redesigning the operating model  

COOs are becoming increasingly accountable for business transformation. The intensity of change programmes continues to rise, driven by factors including market consolidation, cost pressures, regulation, and technology disruption resulting in leaders running multiple transformations in parallel, faster than ever before, making change a continuous activity rather than a series of discrete projects. 


To manage this, firms are standardising how change is designed and delivered. Scaled agile models, for example, are becoming the default approach to ensure technology, process, data, and people move in unison rather than in disconnected waves. 

 

Boards and ExCos are looking for COOs who can maintain the stability of the core business while continuously evolving how it operates. The role is moving away from incremental optimisation towards a more architectural remit, actively reshaping the organisation’s operating model. 

Cyber and technology risk is also a structural consideration. As operating models become more digital and reliant on third parties, COOs with technology accountability are increasingly engaged with areas such as security architecture, identity and access management, third-party oversight, and incident response. These topics are also now widely discussed in boardrooms. 

 

In professional services, the pressure is amplified by automation of knowledge-based tasks. Delivery models, global footprints, and partner economics are being rethought as firms decide which activities to prioritise, what skills will be needed, and how work should be organised. Asset managers, insurers, and alternative investment firms, on the other hand, are similarly reassessing platforms, outsourcing strategies, and organisational design, with an emphasis on simplifying and industrialising the core. 


  • 2. Cost pressures are structural, not cyclical 

Against a backdrop of geopolitical uncertainty and lower-than-expected global growth, the expectation to “do more for less” has become a permanent condition rather than a temporary response to margin pressure. Product homogenisation and competition from digitally native players have shifted the focus toward cost, service quality, and speed forcing many firms to design their operating models on the assumption that margins will not return to historic levels. 


While AI continues to be deployed widely, it is no longer a cost differentiator in itself. Most firms are pursuing similar use cases, often at significant expense, and the initial productivity gains have plateaued. What differentiates leaders now is how effectively AI is embedded into core processes, decision-making, and cost structures. 


Automation, data, and process redesign are being used to reduce friction across end-to-end value chains, while operating models are simplified to remove duplication and overhead. The aim is not only to reduce cost but to create organisations that can operate sustainably and profitably at lower revenue per unit of activity. 


These pressures are particularly evident in asset and wealth management, where fee compression is prompting firms to reconsider what is done in-house versus outsourced, including increased use of Global Capability Centres  (GCCs). Similar dynamics are emerging in law and consulting firms as clients push harder on value, transparency, and outcome-based pricing. Across sectors, COOs are central to the trade-offs between efficiency, control, and client experience. It is these trade-offs, rather than any single technology, that are expected to define performance in the year ahead. 

  • 3. The boardroom era of operational resilience

As a consequence of evolving operating models, COOs are increasing focus on control, resilience, and trust. These topics are no longer solely technology or risk concerns but operational priorities.


Frameworks for operational resilience require firms to identify their most important services and demonstrate that they can operate within defined limits under the most challenging of scenarios. This has reinforced that resilience now sits firmly in the boardroom and part of the COO agenda.

Greater business and functional interconnectivity means that disruption in one part of the chain can quickly affect others, meaning COOs are responsible for ensuring transparency and coherence across functions such as risk, compliance, data governance, and service quality. In practice, this involves including business continuity, third-party oversight, data quality, and scenario-based stress testing in operational decision-making 

  • 4. Succession and bench strength 

It is becoming increasingly common for the COO to hold one of the broadest functional remits on the executive team. This is the continuation of a long-term trend, with leaders from technology, transformation, operations, and even the front office stepping into the role, often bringing a different mindset or skill set to the position. 


As the COO remit becomes more expansive and less standardised across firms, succession planning is becoming more complex and more strategic. The role can no longer be filled solely through tenure or functional excellence in one domain; it requires a blend of (future) commercial judgement, delivery credibility, technological fluency, and organisational leadership. 


As a result, COOs are placing greater emphasis on developing leadership depth across their teams. This means assessing not only current performance, but future capability needs, identifying potential successors earlier, and deliberately building exposure across change, risk, technology, and business leadership. Strengthening the leadership bench is increasingly seen as a form of operational risk management in its own right, ensuring continuity as the demands of the role continue to evolve. 

Taken together, these trends highlight that the COO role is broader and more strategically significant than ever. Running the core business while continuously redesigning the operating model, managing structural cost pressures, maintaining control, resilience, and trust, and building the leadership depth to sustain this over time are now inseparable parts of the mandate. 


As COOs navigate these pressures, it is worth considering how well positioned your leadership team is to balance transformation, cost, resilience, and long-term capability, and where new perspectives or skills might help ensure your operations remain robust and competitive. 

About Leathwaite

At Leathwaite, we specialize in placing enterprise leaders who think business first, function second - leaders who don’t just manage their domain but actively push forward progressive functional agendas. While our searches align with business areas, what truly defines our work is the leadership expectations, navigating transformation, accelerating change, and operating at pace.


We don’t just match candidates to job titles; we identify leaders with the agility, foresight, and growth mindset to thrive in evolving environments. By understanding both the business context and the leadership capabilities required, we take a creative, strategic approach to executive search—finding enterprise leaders who move businesses forward.

 

With deep market insight, a broad industry perspective, and a commitment to excellence, we don’t just fill roles - we build leadership teams that shape the future.

Chris Davey

Consultant

T: +44 207 151 5107

Chris.davey@leathwaite.com

Close